New American Cinema
Author: Jon E Lewis
This collection of essays provides the first comprehensive survey of Hollywood and independent films from the mid-sixties to the present. Deliberately eclectic and panoramic, The New American Cinema brings together thirteen leading film scholars who present a range of theoretical, critical, and historical perspectives on this rich and pivotal era in American cinema.
Table of Contents:
Acknowledgments | ||
Introduction | 1 | |
Movies and Money | ||
Auteur Cinema and the "Film Generation" in 1970s Hollywood | 11 | |
Auteurs and the New Hollywood | 38 | |
From Roadshowing to Saturation Release: Majors, Independents, and Marketing/Distribution Innovations | 64 | |
Money Matters: Hollywood in the Corporate Era | 87 | |
Cinema and Culture | ||
A Rose Is a Rose? Real Women and a Lost War | 125 | |
From Pillar to Postmodern: Race, Class, and Gender in the Male Rampage Film | 146 | |
Your Self Storage: Female Investigation and Male Performativity in the Woman's Psychothriller | 187 | |
Conspiracy Theory and Political Murder in America: Oliver Stone's JFK and the Facts of the Matter | 217 | |
Zooming Out: The End of Offscreen Space | 248 | |
Independents and Independence | ||
John Cassavetes: Amateur Director | 275 | |
Independent Features: Hopes and Dreams | 307 | |
A Circus of Dreams and Lies: The Black Film Wave at Middle Age | 328 | |
Culture as Fiction: The Ethnographic Impulse in the Films of Peggy Ahwesh, Su Friedrich, and Leslie Thornton | 353 | |
Selective Bibliography | 379 | |
Contributors | 387 | |
Index | 389 |
See also: RĂ©ussite des Subventions :Point par point
Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women in America
Author: Robert L Nelson
Based on case studies of four organizations that were sued for pay discrimination, Legalizing Gender Inequality challenges existing theories of gender inequality within economic, sociological, and legal contexts. The book argues that male-female earnings differentials cannot be explained adequately by market forces, principles of efficiency, or society-wide sexism. Rather it suggests that employing organizations tend to disadvantage holders of predominantly female jobs by denying them power in organizational politics and reproducing male cultural advantages.The book argues that the courts have, by uncritically accepting the market explanation for wage disparity, tended to legitimate and to legalize a crucial dimension of gender inequality.
No comments:
Post a Comment