Thursday, January 8, 2009

New American Cinema or Legalizing Gender Inequality

New American Cinema

Author: Jon E Lewis

This collection of essays provides the first comprehensive survey of Hollywood and independent films from the mid-sixties to the present. Deliberately eclectic and panoramic, The New American Cinema brings together thirteen leading film scholars who present a range of theoretical, critical, and historical perspectives on this rich and pivotal era in American cinema.



Table of Contents:
Acknowledgments
Introduction1
Movies and Money
Auteur Cinema and the "Film Generation" in 1970s Hollywood11
Auteurs and the New Hollywood38
From Roadshowing to Saturation Release: Majors, Independents, and Marketing/Distribution Innovations64
Money Matters: Hollywood in the Corporate Era87
Cinema and Culture
A Rose Is a Rose? Real Women and a Lost War125
From Pillar to Postmodern: Race, Class, and Gender in the Male Rampage Film146
Your Self Storage: Female Investigation and Male Performativity in the Woman's Psychothriller187
Conspiracy Theory and Political Murder in America: Oliver Stone's JFK and the Facts of the Matter217
Zooming Out: The End of Offscreen Space248
Independents and Independence
John Cassavetes: Amateur Director275
Independent Features: Hopes and Dreams307
A Circus of Dreams and Lies: The Black Film Wave at Middle Age328
Culture as Fiction: The Ethnographic Impulse in the Films of Peggy Ahwesh, Su Friedrich, and Leslie Thornton353
Selective Bibliography379
Contributors387
Index389

See also: RĂ©ussite des Subventions :Point par point

Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets and Unequal Pay for Women in America

Author: Robert L Nelson

Based on case studies of four organizations that were sued for pay discrimination, Legalizing Gender Inequality challenges existing theories of gender inequality within economic, sociological, and legal contexts. The book argues that male-female earnings differentials cannot be explained adequately by market forces, principles of efficiency, or society-wide sexism. Rather it suggests that employing organizations tend to disadvantage holders of predominantly female jobs by denying them power in organizational politics and reproducing male cultural advantages.The book argues that the courts have, by uncritically accepting the market explanation for wage disparity, tended to legitimate and to legalize a crucial dimension of gender inequality.



No comments: